5.2.4 Avoidance of unsuitable host trees and nonhosts
Host plant suitability in insects has been reviewed by Scriber
(1984). A host plant's suitability to bark beetles varies with its
nutritional quality and composition of anti-insect toxins. Nonhost
trees are probably less nutritional, and the beetle in most cases
would not be adapted to detoxifying some of the nonhost toxins that
have evolved for use against other herbivorous insects. A beetle
would save much time and energy if it can discriminate the host
from the nonhost and determine the suitability of a host by
olfactory means without the need to land. Sometimes host and
nonhost trees are in virtual contact and the beetle could land by
mistake on the nonhost; however, short-range olfactory cues might
indicate the inappropriateness of the bark substrate. If the beetle
still could not decide, boring a short distance into the nonhost
might reveal the lack of feeding stimulants or the presence of
deterrents so that the beetle would leave.
According to studies in the previous section, bark beetles
find their host tree by attraction to host volatiles (or after
random landing and probing). However, it is becoming increasingly
apparent that many beetles avoid nonhost trees due to specific
odors. It is inherently more difficult to isolate repellents and
inhibitors used in avoidance behavior than to isolate attractants
since tests of avoidance require one to first isolate the
attractive host odors and then present these with and without the
possibly inhibitory nonhost odors. Several studies indicate that at
least some species of bark beetle avoid nonhost volatiles during
their search for host trees. The attraction of both T. piniperda
and H. palliatus to ethanol (1-6 g/day) was reduced by odors from
cut logs of nonhost trees, birch, Betula pendula, and aspen,
Populus tremula (Schroeder, 1992). In future experiments, host logs
(or monoterpenes and ethanol) should be tested instead of ethanol
alone to simulate the host tree. Dickens et al. (1992) reduced the
attraction response of D. frontalis, I. grandicollis and I. avulsus
to aggregation pheromone by release of the green-leaf volatiles, 1-
hexanol and hexanal. T. domesticum colonizes wood of deciduous
trees (e.g. Fagus sylvatica, Quercus spp. Betula spp.) and is known
to be attracted to ethanol (Magema et al., 1982; Paiva and Kiesel,
1985). Conifer monoterpenes of Scots pine and verbenone (from
decaying conifers) reduced response of this species to ethanol
(Byers, 1992a) and would provide a mechanism for avoiding nonhosts
and unsuitable colonization areas. This also is valid for the
hardwood-breeding Anisandrus dispar (Schroeder and Lindelöw,
1989).
In addition to their ability of discriminating the host from
among nonhost trees, flying beetles are capable of determining the
suitability of their host. Verbenone is found in relatively large
amounts (ćg) in male hindguts of several pest bark beetles of North
America, D. frontalis, D. brevicomis, D. ponderosae, and D.
pseudotsugae (Renwick and Vité, 1968; Rudinsky et al., 1974; Byers
et al., 1984; Pierce et al., 1987), but in low amounts (ng) in T.
piniperda (Lanne et al., 1987), or essentially absent in I.
paraconfusus, I. typographus, and P. chalcographus (Byers, 1983b;
Birgersson et al., 1984, 1990). Verbenone inhibits the attraction
of these beetles to their respective aggregation pheromones
(Renwick and Vité, 1969, 1970; Byers and Wood, 1980; Bakke, 1981;
Byers et al., 1989c; Byers, 1993b). Some microorganisms isolated
from bark beetles or their gallery walls, may convert alpha-pinene to
cis- and trans-verbenol (Bacillus cereus, Brand et al., 1975), or
trans-verbenol to verbenone (various yeasts, Leufvén et al., 1984).
A fungal culture isolated from the mycangium of D. frontalis was
able to convert trans-verbenol to verbenone, and it was proposed
that this process may account for termination of attack (Brand et
al., 1976). Verbenone is increasingly released from ageing logs of
spruce and pine colonized by bark beetles (I. typographus,
Birgersson and Bergström, 1989; T. piniperda, Byers et al., 1989c),
possibly due to the activity of microorganisms.
Byers (1989a, b) speculated that if verbenone is a consistent
signal of microbial activity in decaying hosts, then a bark beetle
species may have evolved an avoidance to this compound (a
kairomone) in order to avoid unsuitable hosts. This species then
could have evolved to produce verbenone as a pheromone that reduced
intraspecific competition, since the avoidance response was already
existent. Other bark beetle species might then evolve to avoid
species that produced verbenone (as an allomone), and so avoid
interspecific competition. Sympatric species on the same host might
coevolve response to and/or production of verbenone since the
chemical could serve as a signal for several types of beneficial
information (kairomone, pheromone, and allomone). Verbenone does
not always inhibit bark beetles, for example, H. palliatus feeds in
unhealthy or dying Scots pines that probably are releasing
verbenone (Byers et al., 1989c), and the beetle's attraction to
ethanol was not inhibited by verbenone (Byers, 1992a). Deciduous
trees in a state of decay may not release verbenone since they
probably do not have alpha-pinene, thus T. domesticum could evolve to
avoid decadent nonhost pines by avoiding verbenone (Byers,
1992a).
In the case of conifer bark beetles, verbenone is increasingly
implicated as a general sign of host unsuitability (due to
microbial decay or competition with bark beetles). Therefore, it is
paradoxical that conifers have not evolved the capacity of
converting alpha-pinene, which they have in abundance, to verbenone in
order to become repellent to bark beetles and thereby increase
resistance.
Byers, J.A. 1995. Host tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark
beetles, in R.T. Cardé and W.J. Bell (eds.). Chemical Ecology of
Insects 2. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 154-213.